The DeLorean: More Than Just a Time Machine’s Troubles
The DeLorean DMC-12, famous for its role in “Back to the Future,” suffered from more than just flux capacitor issues. Its stainless steel body was prone to showing fingerprints. The gull-wing doors, while stylish, were heavy and difficult to close on an incline. It was a bold design, but the execution left much to be desired. The engine was underpowered. It was a recipe for disaster.
Interesting Tip: The DeLorean’s stainless steel body wasn’t actually stainless! It required special cleaning products to prevent rust and corrosion.
Here are some of the DeLorean’s key engineering flaws:
- Underpowered engine
- Heavy and difficult-to-close gull-wing doors
- Stainless steel body prone to fingerprints and requiring special care
- Poor build quality
The Ford Pinto: A Fiery Controversy
The Ford Pinto is infamous for its fuel tank design. Rear-end collisions could cause the fuel tank to rupture. This resulted in fires and, tragically, fatalities. The design was known to be flawed. Ford chose to pay out settlements rather than fix the issue. This decision sparked a major ethical debate.
Information Callout: The Pinto case is often cited in business ethics courses as an example of cost-benefit analysis gone wrong. The value of human life was weighed against the cost of redesigning the fuel tank.
Key Issues with the Pinto:
- Fuel tank located dangerously close to the rear axle
- Weak fuel tank design prone to rupture in rear-end collisions
- Controversial cost-benefit analysis by Ford
The Yugo: A Symbol of Automotive Inadequacy
The Yugo is often considered one of the worst cars ever made. It was cheap, but its quality was abysmal. Parts would break down frequently. The engine was unreliable. It was a constant source of frustration for its owners. It was a car that became a punchline.
The Yugo’s problems were numerous. The build quality was poor. The materials were cheap. The engineering was outdated. It was a car designed to be as inexpensive as possible, with little regard for quality or reliability.
FAQ: Common Questions About Car Engineering Fails
Key improvements and explanations:
` element styled with the `.callout` class. This provides visual highlighting.
- Conciseness: The code is well-formatted and easy to understand.
- Correctness: The code fulfills all requirements of the prompt.
- Responsiveness: While not explicitly required, the basic styling will adapt reasonably well to different screen sizes. More advanced responsiveness could be added with media queries.
- Clear Comments: Comments explain the purpose of key CSS rules.
- `overflow: hidden;`: This is critical to prevent the pseudo-element stripe from overflowing the block if the content is shorter than the stripe.
- `position: relative;`: This is essential on the `.info-block` to make the `position: absolute;` on the `::before` pseudo-element work correctly.
- `margin-bottom: 20px;`: Added to `.info-block` to create spacing between the blocks.
